QUOTE (pmcnamara @ Jan 2 2008, 08:30 AM)

Arnold.. why do you think its a good idea that only a single car is allowed 16v when the rest of the cars have to be 8v ?
I am not hung up on 16v or 8 v,,, or Gm vs ford vs Dodge.
The big picture is What is the best bang for the BUCK....You have to SAVE racers from them selfs,,,If you do not write rules that force you to use the cheapest, well performing equipment,,,Some racers will always choose the most expensive way to go that will insure that they dominate a class,,,,IF street stocks allowed Corvettes,,,then the one or 2 guys that could afford Vetts would dominate over all the Monte Carlos,,,would this be good for the Street Stock class? IMHO NO!
Therefore,,the only fwd 4 cyl. cars that should be legal MUsT be,,
produced in very large numbers,
Cheap,
Locally Plentiful,
Late model ( No more than 10 years old) ,
Low mileage, ( ~70,0000 miles or LeSS)
Easy to build and set up for racing.
Not require a Hoist to remove the drive train.
Lots of LOW mileage, Cheap parts available at the Local Junk yard.
Spartan's FWD 4 cyl class has been around for many years, longer than most other tracks.
when the class started out many years ago, Low mileage 2. 5 liter 2 valve per cylinder fwd cars were common, plentiful and cheap, and so were their used low mileage parts.,,but NOT no MOre,,
The 2 valve per cylinder that
used to meet all the above criteria was the Mid 1980's Dodge Shadow with the 2.5 Liter SOHC 2 valve per cylinder engine.
But because these cars are now HIGH mileage OLD cars, with NO low mileage parts available in the junk yards,,some thing HAD to replace these old cars.,,,or cost would escalate and the class would be hurt.
The next logical choice was the 4 door NEON with the 2.0 liter SOHC engine.,,Because IT best met all the above criteria...NO other car even comes close,,,For NOW the racing the NEon makes as much sense as racing the 350 Chevy V in a street stock.
IT is now cheaper to build and race a NEON than any 8v car,,,It cost more to build, race and fix a 8 valve car than a neon...right Pat?
EVERY track that has allowed
any 16v engine has had big problems with RARE, Expensive cars dominating the class, and at many tracks it has KILLED the class.,,or turned the class into an expensive class.
Would you like to run against Mitsubishi Eclipse's and Honda Acuras? Who could afford to build a Honda Acura? and could you afford the parts to fix it?
By only allowing NEONS, the field of cars is much closer, therefore the SHOW is better, and teching is easier. Plus the cost of racing is cheaper.
I have worked for GM R&D for over 30 years, and have only raced GM engines,,,It was VERY HARD for me to admit that the neon was better suited for Cheap FWD racing than the GM FWD 4cyl cars. But the facts were just too overwhelming. I hate admitting it, but Today the GM Cobalt with the 2.2 DOHC 16v engine is too expensive for this class.
but IN a few years,,, legalizing the 4 door ford focus will may make sense when they come down in price and costs, then a few more years later the Cobalt may become cheap enough to be made legal.
arnold.